Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-32712012-20190318205926/@comment-32712012-20190507210024

This does bear an interesting resemblance to that discussion, but I think that there's an important distinction here between the content that we're talking about now and what we were talking about then, namely: The content that we're currently talking about seems to be carefully thought out with the intention of building a useful universe but happened to include some questionable content, whereas the content on the Chima Lego Wiki seemed to be a simple attempt to see what the author(s) could get away with without being banned (i.e. "How grossly can we misrepresent the canon and how much junk can we fill it with for the lulz without negative repercussions?"; i.e. trolling at its purest). As such, while I do find the resemblance to be interesting, I'd just like to make clear that this is not the same discussion and that, if I may be so bold, the content that we're talking about now is far more worthwhile, just to avoid anyone becoming confused about this discussion's nature for the worse.