Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-32712012-20180827090555/@comment-32712012-20181020202026

I can imagine what this would look like from the link, so you don't need to make a mock-up. This was a good example, so thanks for that. :)

As to whether or not we should have art on a separate gallery page, I don't think that that makes much sense in the wiki's current state, as each of the wiki's pages are so short that moving any content at all to a subpage would simply multiply the number of pages and make users click links more frequently without much added advantage. This is not to say that the idea wouldn't make sense in some places—for example, on the Unikitty wiki, where that Unikitty page has a gallery that looks to contain several hundred pictures, that absolutely makes sense—I just don't think that that makes sense here.

Now, I want to say one final thing. A point that I'm not sure if I'd made clear is that I want decisions to be based on consensus, i.e. reflecting agreement between active editors. As such, since the bulk of the current discussion has just been between you and me, I'm reluctant to make any changes at all when there's this previously established consensus. However, if we could get the opinions of the other editors involved, that would make it a lot easier to see consensus, as we could then see what people think of your ideas versus previously established consensus versus any new ideas etc. For that reason, I'm pinging the three previously involved editors on their message walls to try to get some kind of broader opinion pool and consensus.